Do you think it's right to put a size limit on the signitures here?I have nothing against the Mod's or anything,but I really think there should be no limit or we can up more without, (Sorry,your sig has been deleted because it's too big another example I got had the F word on it.Is this really fair?Discuss.
-- Edited by TheNightPrincess. at 21:00, 2008-12-16
no i think its a good idea b/c ppl wit slow internets would hav a hard time loadin all thos imgs and when every1 has huuuuuge sigs i have to scroll a lot and i hate that!
I personally think putting a size limit on the signatures was a very good idea. If Xtream hadn't done it, then I certainly would have.
As blackneko pointed out, people using dial-up and with slow internet connections have difficulty loading the page when there's a huge load of pictures to show. I've experienced the lag a few times, and trust me, it's really annoying.
Plus, having enormous signatures is kind of disapproved of on just about EVERY other forum. Really. You could check some if you don't believe me, but it's true.
Also, I would like to point out that having huge signatures also stretches the page out quite a bit. Usually, scrolling through fifty small posts would take a few seconds, but because everyone's sig is enormous, scrolling can take more than a few minutes.
In short, signatures with assloads of pictures are irritating to load, and it honestly works a lot better if there's a restriction on how big they are.
Love Vitani and her singing.
