Eh. It was okay. [shrugs] I thought that the battle between Dumbledore and Voldemort in the Ministry was pretty nice, but other than that... eh.
__________________
Bunnies aren't cute like everybody supposes! They've got them hoppy legs and twitchy little noses! And what's with all the carrots! Why do they need such good eyesight for anyway?! Bunnies! Bunnies! It must beBUNNIES!!
I thought it was pretty accurate as far as the previous movies went. (The 3rd and 4th, at least.) It was a bit rushed, but that is to be expected, as it is hard to fit 870 pages in a 2 and a half hour film. Had a few retarded moments, like when the order flew from Harry's house to Grimauld place, and in the process swooping in between buildings and boats and stuff in PLAIN SIGHT. But those are forgivable.
Dolores Umbridge was very frightening and great. Luna Lovegood was PERFECT. Gary Oldman was great as always. I still think Michael Gambdon sucks at being Dumbledore, especially when compared to Richard Harris. Eh.
As far as this movie goes, it was pretty accurate. Umbridge and Luna were excellent, Ginny is definetly not pretty and why oh why did they make Cho the sneak? And Snape's Worst Memmory was too short.... ah well, he is my favourite character.
__________________
The winners write the history, and the losers children will be brainwashed by it.
As far as this movie goes, it was pretty accurate. Umbridge and Luna were excellent, Ginny is definetly not pretty and why oh why did they make Cho the sneak? And Snape's Worst Memmory was too short.... ah well, he is my favourite character.
I agree with everything you just said there.
__________________
Bunnies aren't cute like everybody supposes! They've got them hoppy legs and twitchy little noses! And what's with all the carrots! Why do they need such good eyesight for anyway?! Bunnies! Bunnies! It must beBUNNIES!!
